The question always seems to boil down to entitlement - who deserves what. The interesting conundrum when entitlement is reviewed in relation to elected officials is the disparity between what they think they deserve and what they think the rest of us deserve.
Take national health care reform, for instance. It's a huge issue; everyone's talking about it. We wonder what the proposed changes will do for (or to) us - the average taxpayer. Our legislators don't have to wonder what it will do for (or to) them; they have a very nice benefits package that includes very good health coverage.
How can our elected representatives decide what's best for whom when the decision won't affect them because they already have the best and believe they deserve it?
And how about those NM public employees' pension plans? How can our state legislature vote to require public employees to contribute a higher annual amount to their pension plans and not include themselves? Aren't they public employees? (Yes, they are.) Granted, the additional amount collected would be minimal if our legislators had included themselves in the legislation, but that isn't the issue and they should have known that.
This is a lost opportunity, where a little integrity could have made up for lost ground; our legislators not only missed the mark but they added another layer of mistrust to the already multilayered film that shrouds New Mexico's state leadership.
Who deserves what? A very good question and one we should be answering, not them.
New Mexico: Covid-19 Cases Continue to Rising
-
In New Mexico, the total coronavirus cases have now crossed the 100,000
marks and are continuing to rise each day. Each day, the cases are…
4 years ago
No comments:
Post a Comment